2026-03-19 7:31 AM - last edited on 2026-04-15 7:58 AM by Sara BEN HADJ YAHYA
See Inconsistent pin naming for CubeMX - does the same apply to CubeMX2 ?
(Cross-posting at the request of @Ghofrane GSOURI; again, no label available for "Suggestions")
Solved! Go to Solution.
2026-03-20 4:54 AM
Hi
We have checked the generated code, and it should be solved in CubeXM2. The defines is now called:
/** Primary aliases for RCC_OSC_IN pin */
#define PH0_OSC_IN_PORT HAL_GPIOH
#define PH0_OSC_IN_PIN HAL_GPIO_PIN_0
/** Primary aliases for RCC_OSC_OUT pin */
#define PH1_OSC_OUT_PORT HAL_GPIOH
#define PH1_OSC_OUT_PIN HAL_GPIO_PIN_1
So there is consistency in the naming. If you find any non consistent naming schemes, please let us know, so we can get them fixed!
2026-03-20 4:54 AM
Hi
We have checked the generated code, and it should be solved in CubeXM2. The defines is now called:
/** Primary aliases for RCC_OSC_IN pin */
#define PH0_OSC_IN_PORT HAL_GPIOH
#define PH0_OSC_IN_PIN HAL_GPIO_PIN_0
/** Primary aliases for RCC_OSC_OUT pin */
#define PH1_OSC_OUT_PORT HAL_GPIOH
#define PH1_OSC_OUT_PIN HAL_GPIO_PIN_1
So there is consistency in the naming. If you find any non consistent naming schemes, please let us know, so we can get them fixed!
We’re moving the ST Community to a new platform to give you a better and more reliable community experience.