2021-04-05 7:46 PM
I used HAL_I2C_MASTER_Transmit/Receive
The transmission function put a delay using the for statement as shown below.
HAL_StatusTypeDef HAL_I2C_Master_Transmit(I2C_HandleTypeDef *hi2c, uint16_t DevAddress, uint8_t *pData, uint16_t Size, uint32_t Timeout)
{
uint32_t tickstart;
if (hi2c->State == HAL_I2C_STATE_READY)
{
/* Process Locked */
__HAL_LOCK(hi2c);
/* Init tickstart for timeout management*/
tickstart = HAL_GetTick();
if (I2C_WaitOnFlagUntilTimeout(hi2c, I2C_FLAG_BUSY, SET, I2C_TIMEOUT_BUSY, tickstart) != HAL_OK)
{
return HAL_ERROR;
}
hi2c->State = HAL_I2C_STATE_BUSY_TX;
hi2c->Mode = HAL_I2C_MODE_MASTER;
hi2c->ErrorCode = HAL_I2C_ERROR_NONE;
/* Prepare transfer parameters */
hi2c->pBuffPtr = pData;
hi2c->XferCount = Size;
hi2c->XferISR = NULL;
/* Send Slave Address */
/* Set NBYTES to write and reload if hi2c->XferCount > MAX_NBYTE_SIZE and generate RESTART */
if (hi2c->XferCount > MAX_NBYTE_SIZE)
{
hi2c->XferSize = MAX_NBYTE_SIZE;
I2C_TransferConfig(hi2c, DevAddress, (uint8_t)hi2c->XferSize, I2C_RELOAD_MODE, I2C_GENERATE_START_WRITE);
}
else
{
hi2c->XferSize = hi2c->XferCount;
I2C_TransferConfig(hi2c, DevAddress, (uint8_t)hi2c->XferSize, I2C_AUTOEND_MODE, I2C_GENERATE_START_WRITE);
}
for(volatile uint32_t i =0; i<1000; i++)
{
}
while (hi2c->XferCount > 0U)
{
for(volatile uint32_t i =0; i<1000; i++)
{
}
/* Wait until TXIS flag is set */
if (I2C_WaitOnTXISFlagUntilTimeout(hi2c, Timeout, tickstart) != HAL_OK)
{
return HAL_ERROR;
}
/* Write data to TXDR */
hi2c->Instance->TXDR = *hi2c->pBuffPtr;
/* Increment Buffer pointer */
hi2c->pBuffPtr++;
hi2c->XferCount--;
hi2c->XferSize--;
if ((hi2c->XferCount != 0U) && (hi2c->XferSize == 0U))
{
/* Wait until TCR flag is set */
if (I2C_WaitOnFlagUntilTimeout(hi2c, I2C_FLAG_TCR, RESET, Timeout, tickstart) != HAL_OK)
{
return HAL_ERROR;
}
if (hi2c->XferCount > MAX_NBYTE_SIZE)
{
hi2c->XferSize = MAX_NBYTE_SIZE;
I2C_TransferConfig(hi2c, DevAddress, (uint8_t)hi2c->XferSize, I2C_RELOAD_MODE, I2C_NO_STARTSTOP);
}
else
{
hi2c->XferSize = hi2c->XferCount;
I2C_TransferConfig(hi2c, DevAddress, (uint8_t)hi2c->XferSize, I2C_AUTOEND_MODE, I2C_NO_STARTSTOP);
}
}
//osDelay(1);
}
/* No need to Check TC flag, with AUTOEND mode the stop is automatically generated */
/* Wait until STOPF flag is set */
if (I2C_WaitOnSTOPFlagUntilTimeout(hi2c, Timeout, tickstart) != HAL_OK)
{
return HAL_ERROR;
}
/* Clear STOP Flag */
__HAL_I2C_CLEAR_FLAG(hi2c, I2C_FLAG_STOPF);
/* Clear Configuration Register 2 */
I2C_RESET_CR2(hi2c);
hi2c->State = HAL_I2C_STATE_READY;
hi2c->Mode = HAL_I2C_MODE_NONE;
/* Process Unlocked */
__HAL_UNLOCK(hi2c);
return HAL_OK;
}
else
{
return HAL_BUSY;
}
}
However, receive function is not delayed in the same way.
I checked with the oscilloscope, when the I2C_TransferConfig function is executed, the SLAVE address and data are taken before the FOR statement is executed.
The I2C_TransferConfig function is ambiguous to modify because it is a function that modify the CR2 register.
Is there any way to apply the delay between the slave address and the data when receiving via i2c communication?
We’re moving the ST Community to a new platform to give you a better and more reliable community experience.