cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Can I easily combine the LSM6DS0 and the NUCLEO-L496-ZG?

MAlte.1
Associate

In our current project, we chose a NUCLEO-L496 ZG as the core of our prototypes hardware. Now I am interested in combining the board with two fitting inertial measurement units. I think that the LSM6DS0 would be a good choice. How would you combine the board with the sensors? And is it easy to implement? As mentioned before, it is just a first prototype and therefore easy implementation a key argument.

This discussion is locked. Please start a new topic to ask your question.
1 REPLY 1
Eleon BORLINI
ST Employee

Hi @MAlte.1​ , a preliminary question for you: are you referring to the LSM6DS0 ("0 = zero") or to the LSM6DSO ("O = O letter")? I suggest you to use the LSM6DSO, that is of course a good choice in term of performances (parameter accuracy), embedded features, working modes. I suggest you to start with the STM32Cube_FW_L4 package, which contains the specific drivers for the NUCLEO-L496-ZG board (suggested folder for the SPI communication --> \Projects\NUCLEO-L496ZG\Examples\SPI) and for the LSM6DSO device (suggested folder --> \Drivers\BSP\Components\lsm6dsl for the DSL, or Github link for the standard C drivers for DSO device). You can on the other side start from scratch and set the .ioc configuration for this Nucleo board directly from the STM32CubeMX. Regards

Announcement

We’re moving the ST Community to a new platform to give you a better and more reliable community experience.